
He grew up on the family farm in the United States, before pursuing his passion for physics. Professor Miller, born in 1909, was his Eastern European parents' ninth child. He used the developments as reminder to have "faith in physics", before moving on with his show. "It went! It went! Oh ho! … Mamma mia did it go!" Professor Miller exclaimed in shock and delight. He returned to his lesson to explain what may have gone wrong, when an almighty bang thundered through the set. Enjoy hours reminiscing on Christmas Day about the Coles Cafeteria, Mello Yello yo-yos, Professor Julius Sumner Miller, Nintendos original handheld Game. Then he waited … and waited … but the drum remained disappointingly intact. Next, he doused it with a watering can, and later, ice. Soon after, it started spewing steam and the Professor and an assistant sealed it up.

The beloved presenter of Why Is It So? graced Australian television screens from 1963-1986, sharing his passion for physics through a variety of entertaining experiments. That's a (very rough) description of Professor Sumner Miller's 1964 attempt to crush a metal drum with a dash of water and the power of physics. If only I was science-savvy.It starts with a flop, and ends with a bang, and not once does Professor Julius Sumner Miller's faith in physics falter. Julius Sumner Miller Concerning the Electric Charge on a Moving Vehicle, American Journal of Physics, Volume 21, Issue 4, 1 April 1953, Pages 316, https://doi. Did the Oarsome Foursome lever off the river in Barcelona, or their scull? Or both? Like a rower, I'm looking backwards at my wasted lab years, desperately trying to make headway in these troubled waters. Which leaves us with our rowlock dilemma.

As Margot Charlton, an Oxford spokesperson, had explained to Dr Hughes, "The OED entry for siphon dates from 1911 and was written by editors who were not scientists…" The database was revised, and good science was restored. Indeed, many dictionaries had fallen prey to the same siphon furphy. Amazingly the boo-boo had been embedded for almost a century. Seriously, any petrol thief knows that basic.
#Julius sumner miller books series
The series was hosted by American scientist Julius Sumner Miller, who demonstrated experiments involving various disciplines in the world of physics. Dr Stephen Hughes alerted the Oxford to the fact that a siphon relies on gravity to operate, rather than atmospheric pressure, as its definition asserted. Julius Sumner Miller's Dramatic Demonstrations in Physics Start Course Course Description Demonstrations in Physics was an educational science series produced in Australia by ABC Television in 1969. Five years ago, a physics lecturer from Queensland University of Technology noticed an error on the page. Keep in mind the Oxford has form in this department. Or the cox of lexicons, the Shorter Oxford: "a device, usually consisting of a notch, two thole-pins, or a rounded fork, on the gunwale of a boat, forming a fulcrum for the oar in rowing." So which rowlock party is actually speaking bollocks? Or is the fulcrum role adaptable through a single regatta? Is Dave Ringland off-course, or did DH & crew make a rowing blue? Here's the Collins: "a swivelling device attached to the gunwale of a boat that holds an oar in place and acts as a fulcrum during rowing." Whichever term you choose, most dictionaries I've checked, before and since Mr Ringland's email, have cited the all-important f-word in their definition. The load is the combined weight of the boat and rower (concentrated at the oarlock) and the effort is the drive needed to propel the boat forwards.

"The rowing cycle represents a second order of levers in which the fulcrum is in fact at the blade end of the oar in the water. WHY IT IS SO by Julius Sumner Miller (Paperback, 1971). Dave Ringland, a Newcastle solver, felt the need to object. BOOK OF MILLERGRAMS - Professor JULIUS SUMNER MILLER - Unread.

For the record, my colleague DH had posed the definition, though I've succumbed to similar wording in the past. The clue was a Quick clue from last week: Fulcrum for a rowing blade (7). Regardless, I can still call an ohm a unit of power (try resistance, Einstein), or an oarlock a fulcrum. (It is.) To make a clue for syzygy, I must align my facts. Before I call an urchin an echinoderm I need to double-check the dictionary. Given that shortfall, I'm prone to blundering on the science front.
